[TECH] My Workflow or Workflow

After numerous emails, I decided to write this small article to explain in detail the way I work.
The workflow is an important step not to be overlooked for a photographer. Indeed, it will often take more time behind the computer to the shooting. This is not necessarily specific to digital SLR users. Our dear photographers equipped with silver, had also long hours in their dark room, laboratory or in front of a screen to scan their works! So I hope we can discuss our practices in order to spend more time behind the small LCD screens of our boxes, rather than our very large computer screens ![]()
I will not discuss here, the subject of pre-production (preparation), because it is specific to each type of picture, and therefore very special to me. However, in a future post I will try to reveal my organization before my shoots.
At home, post-production begins on the way home from a shoot (or subway train). Even on the ground, especially for my wedding. I tend to be sorted directly on the screen of the box. I basically check the sharpness of my photos with full zoom in playback mode. This is generally not recommended, but we must admit that the LCD of the 5D Mark II is fairly accurate with its definition (with the 50D, 500D, 550D, 7D and 1DMK4). I would not recommend doing this type of selection on a screen with a resolution of less than 920 000 points. Indeed, below this limit, the precise details will not be as relevant. In this case, better to await loading on a computer. This step frees up some space on the memory card and saves a lot of time when importing and breeding on the computer. Caution, however, do not delete the photos too fast! For the impatient, wait to get home ![]()
Now about the post production.
Prerequisites:
- A powerful enough computer. For those with soon change their configuration, do not underestimate the power of the latter on the grounds that you do "than the picture." Photography application and require a lot of resources. Especially if you shoot in RAW with boxes of very high resolution (> 15MP). I personally am a strong supporter of Apple and I use the most powerful of the moment (May 2010), The Imac 27 "Icore seven (four cores) 2.8 GHz, 8GB RAM, 2TB hard drive. Performance is very good, similar to the Mac Pro 2.26 ghz quad core. Being a Mac user, I can therefore advise you that the following configurations to suit your photo equipment:
- You shoot mostly in JPEG, and use LR or Aperture: Minimum requirement, Macbook Pro 15 "or iMac 20" with an Intel Core 2 Duo 2.0 GHz, 2GB RAM
- You shoot in RAW <to 15MP and use LR or Aperture: Minimum requirement, Macbook Pro 15 "or iMac 20" min with an Intel Core 2 Duo 2.4 GHz min, 4GB RAM
- You shoot in RAW and 18 MP + and use LR or Aperture: Macbook pro 15 "or iMac 20" min with an Intel Core 2 Duo 3.06 GHz min, 4GB RAM. You understood it, your case will cost more expensive, your computer will be more expensive.
- A sensor calibration. If you are an amateur beginner, the probe is not necessarily the priority. At least, the importance of a probe is related to the quality of your screen. Screens low-end PC can be full of surprises. The contrasts and colors displayed may be further altered! Be careful, your workstation. Also note that a good probe to screen a first prize will not be very useful. Only screens medium / high end can fully exploit a calibration. Macs them, equivalent to high-end PC. Thus, the screen quality is much better (you also pay the price). On some of my Macs, I happened to see a significant difference between a base color profile, and a calibrated profile: My article on the Spyder 3 sensor . By cons, if you are an amateur expert, a semi-pro or pro, so this purchase would be very useful!
- A card reader. The reader is not necessarily essential in itself. However he will be greatly helpful if you have to unload several memory cards. Preferences, try to choose a fairly quick reader and memory cards also swift. Personally, I use the 300 and 400X (45 and 90MB / s). The speed of the card will also prevent failures due to high imports (8-16GB) and wait 2 minutes for the card simply appears. The 133X should be avoided.

A convenient drive from Lexar
- Save with external hard drives. Yes "of"! Indeed, your memories and your works are part of your heritage. So you must save them with a certain paranoia. Know that in large companies, the change of hard drive is done every three years to prevent any problems. That is why, in my organization, I have three external hard drives (see below). One for the contents of my computer (which my photos), one for my bank and Aperture, exclusively reserved for my master RAW and my Aperture library. Sure why, to work "referenced", rather than embedding pictures in your database!
The issue of backup media:
For those who shootent Jpeg, the DVD can be viewed as a backup medium. But I personally do not like them. I much prefer the hard drives. I shoot exclusively in RAW. As a result of the DVD is emblematic dismissed because of his "weak" backup capabilities. The hard drive, it is a bit more expensive, but it allows for daily backups and incremental (it replaces only the modified elements). All this without the delay and DVD burning that pile. Note however that the design life of hard drives (100 years). The latter, if they are not used once a year, are more likely to crash. Another problem is the risk of malfunction (Error reading / writing) than the DVD ... Despite these shortcomings, it remains the best compromise for serious photographers
. You know those shootent in Raw?
Chronological order, I do this:
- Creating an album in Aperture eg "Année_mois_jour_Titre"

Organizing my files
- Import RAW files:
- presets automatically applied to the RAW import: + 0.06 Contrast, Brightness +0.28, and +0.2 exposure. I very rarely apply the saturation tool. I much prefer the adjustment of brightness. It is more subtle and less destructive than the classical saturation.
- In Aperture 2, I applied the same settings on all the pictures, just after the import. Function built directly into the import Aperture 3, is a real time saver!
- Then I wait Aperture treats well all thumbnails (a bit long for 1000 photos).
- The import is complete, I still did not erase the contents of memory cards, especially NOT! This is the first backup.

Import Wizard in Aperture 3
- Sorting and selecting photos, through the removal of blurry images, bad framing, etc..
- Journal of photos one by one, for more precise adjustment of white balance, exposure, contrast and brightness. If necessary I will also adjust the highlights and shadows (white sky, for example). Please do not abuse this tool!
- For minor alterations such as Dust Delete the sensor, cropping, adjustments, or peeling skin defects if I stay in aperture.
Note: I do not apply to sharpen filters because I hate the rendering given to export photos. From experience, it shows very quickly. For noise, same thing. I try to shoot as much as possible to heal my photos, so as not to apply filters to "rescue". More noise reduction is inevitably accompanied by a smoothing and loss of sharpness.

Exporting a JPG with the sharpness filter applied heavily to the right. The contours of the eye has a bad record.
- For major alterations (very rare in marriages) I use Photoshop, always in Aperture.
- For black and white, I use Silver Efex of Niksoftware directly under Aperture. This plug-in is really one of the best tools black and white market. A laboratory, which will give you an exceptional record, "almost silver" your Black and White!
- When all treatments are completed, I turn to the classification. Star ratings photos and allocation of keywords.
- Finally I export all the photos in full resolution and low resolution for delivery on DVD.
- I conceive my images exclusively in Aperture Books. tool design book , is a marvel, and you can have on hand all your photos, classified and recorded. Since the Version3, you can also create photo books out of Apple, such as luxurious Couture Book , or very (very) sélectes Queensberry .
- Slideshows often require an additional selection, and a crop in 16/9 for best viewing on TV screens. Since the slide show feature in Aperture 3, I see them within the software and iDVD to make through the menu and burn the DVD.
- I then exported all the wedding pictures on a web gallery created via the plugin to Photoshelter for Aperture (are the same for LR) or via software export MacOSX / Windows. Thanks to this gallery (protected by a password) Photoshelter, guests can download or purchase prints, share photos on Facebook or Twitter, or view a slideshow. Sample Web Gallery . The photography part is now complete. Now for the backup!

The Plug-In for Aperture Photoshelter

Example of a Photoshelter Gallery
- First automatic backup without making head thanks to the fabulous Time Machine.
Here, the entire contents of my computer is backed up with My RAWS and the ". Aplibrary" (Aperture library with touch-ups, rankings, keywords) are saved. - Second backup of my library aperture through banks of images of the application.

Backing up the Aperture library on external HDD
- Third semi-automatic backup of my RAWS and the ". Aplibrary" Aperture, present in the Images directory from my mac. For that I use the weekly backup software Personal Backup X5. The third hard drive does not stay connected to my computer. After the backup is stored in a secret location to avoid theft or destruction ...

Incremental backup scheduled under Personal Backup X5
- I can now erase my memory card safely. Always format the card after each use! On the one hand, it will avoid ending up with a full card on your next shoot and the other, you'll have less risk of error card (believe me I lost a Lexar 8GB 300X like that).
Schematic summary (click to enlarge):
Learn more:
Where to buy:
- Switch to Mac: Apple store
- Spyder Calibrator 3 pro
- Card Reader LEXAR RW035-266
- Transcend memory cards (very efficient)
- Lexar memory cards (cheaper or more reliable than Transcend)
- Lexar memory cards on Foka
I await your comments and tips!
Read also:
















40 reactions
Always interesting to read you! Real gems of relevant information hidden in your notes.
A question about the sale through Photoshelter. Why do you practice well and not directly with the guests? (I assume as a matter of Logistics, but simple confirmation
)
And this sale is via Photoshelter how? (Drawing sale? JPEG file? That manages print if needed?)
And the backup "bank" is something specific to Aperture? I've never heard of. Finally, simple curiosity, I personally use Lightroom.
@ Simon: Thanks, I'll try to hide them less then
@ Mr Eddy: Directly with the guests? but after marriage it is invisible?
In fact after marriage, I married to communicate the address of the gallery (with a custom domain name. Com). That way they can communicate with everyone around them. The sales process is as follows: Select photos on PhotoShelter (prints any size, any paper, direct download of JPG 21MP), validation of the cart, payment by card or paypal. I receive an email with the details and from there two alternatives:
- Classic prints, it will be automatically by PhotoShelter (there is a choice of supplier) of the blow we do nothing;
- Fine Art Prints, I'd rather do it myself through a lab.
To safeguard the bank, I think LR has a similar system called catalog?
http://www.lemondedelaphoto.com/La-sauvegarde-sous-Lightroom, 555.html
Very well built in aperture, we just have to click a button to save the bank.
that's the ticket on a workflow, thank you, still effective., nice.
Some resources on the PC side, I am an avid amateur
Personally, I'm so far PC (computer business being in this platform, but one day that I will be pt on Mac), I opted for my part for a (trans) portable Clevo (D900F with an i7 desktop, http://www.clevo.com.tw/en/products/prodinfo.asp?productid=19 ), for its power, because as you say, it takes, and if possible a Quad core for treatments with files increasingly large (the 400D to 50D, the RAW file from 10 MB to 20 MB).
For storage / backup, I decided to invest in a Synology NAS (209II + http://www.synology.com/enu/products/DS209+II/index.php ) with 2DD 1 TB in RAID-1 (discs mirrors), a bit expensive but extremely effective, and also works on Mac. It has other interesting features: media server, backup course (tps real synchronization between the laptop and the NAS), Web server (photos, blog), etc. - for the sort, I sort of easy way: YYYY -MM-DD title, but no Aperture or LR catalog, one day be pt.
For software, I use Photoshop and DxO Pro for finishing (contrast, sharpness, ...) or applying filters, and I do not despair to put myself in LR. Aperture not possible, this sequel does not exist on Windows. I tried Silver Efex and yes it is a little above DxO Film Pack ( http://www.dxo.com/fr/photo/filmpack/available_film_looks ) and I which makes pretty good service.
Finally, the probe, I have not yet invested in it but I've thought more than once - although I have not quite figured out how it could work. Anyway, I qd vx make prints personal (eg on DarQroom), I adjust the picture as it ds are more mixed in this case the lab than I see on my screen px. I think that the probe could help in this case (ICC profile?).
Not bad PhotoShelter qd you're a pro, although I suppose it must ê practice.
Question if it is not indiscreet, you go by what lab for prints please? I'm looking for feedback.
thank you again!
Thank you very much for this very interesting workflow
Julian
Ah Aperture's called bank
Concerning the choice of the draw (via PhotoShelter or "fine art"), it is the customer who decides or you? From what I read, there are two systems: "Automated print & product fulfillment" and "Sell Self-Fulfilled prints"
But I do not understand how it manages price side. In the first case, this is one of their lab that handles everything, but they speak of us choose the same price-_-You can tell me more?
For the second, if I understood correctly, we give a price, you get the sub to us and after running the command to print and deliver the customer. You confirm?
And fine art, you hear it? (I reserve that term for a draw on fine art paper precisely, and not the circulation of "base", and I feel that the somewhat hackneyed thinking that just a "big" to draw talk about pulling the level of that of a real exhibition)
Still on PhotoShelter, could you take the option of payment on your account? (Paypal takes fee, I do not know if this option results in charges or not, I have also not understood how it works)
In any case I will pay close attention to this site. A moment that I know, but I tell myself it can be very useful for sales precisely.
Incidentally, the sharpen filter, you do so no wall? It must be a minimum, default RAW is very soft. And from what I understand, you do not photographed jpeg.
I had a version of "intimate" of this process but it is nice to have made a version that I can wish to see hihi.
because with my Macbook Pro with 2.53 GHz dual core processor and 4GB of Ram, so good for the treatment of 21Mp. Where I'm slow, it's about the upload of photos between camera and computer (but that is due to the slowness of my cards, I think).
Good by cons for computers, I find you a bit naughty but still knowing your passion for the Mac and your aversion to the "half measure" that I respect you know
Well, in any case always an excellent job on this blog ... and you restored me want to go treat all my photos "forgotten" in San Francisco ..
Hi
Thank you very much for this very interesting article!
Quick question: how do you do your "watermarks"? Also with Aperture?
Thank you for sharing this very interesting workflow. I completely agree about the comments regarding the storage (two copies, and disk drive, the media are too fragile).
@ Olivier: attention to NAS. They are indeed an excellent storage solution, but no backup. Even if you have a copy of your pictures on your NAS, the NAS is connected to the same electrical network that your PC / Mac, and will therefore suffer the same damage from lightning, power surges, micro cut short all ... small annoyances that do not like hard drives, and RAID-1, RAID-5 will do nothing in this case.
So the NAS is interesting, provided back it up regularly with a USB drive that you can unplug and take shelter. This amounts to two copies in this article.
It's all a bit paranoid, but we are not inventing anything: business practice since the beginning this (disk duplication, backup, backup and duplication of some to put them off-site).
@ Olivier: Thanks Olivier. I did not know Clevo. The least we can say is that it looks solid considering the thickness of the notebook
The raid mirror makes me a little scared. Probably due to my ignorance on that side. If a hard drive dies. the coup seeing no other data are erased or arrive to detect the failure and keep the data? I do not know what RAID has this defect.
As for the difference in contrast, it is possible that it could come your screen / calibration / profile. Indeed DxO FilmPack looks similar but is it as intuitive and ergonomic? Is used there beneath aperture or LR?
For my prints manuals I'm at DarQroom
@ Julien G.: Cool as it may help.
@ Mr Eddy: Ah yes ... the semantic information on PhotoShelter you can sell cars, where patrons order through your gallery, but the impression in direct proportion EZprint eg. If you choose the self-Fullfilment then you just get the payment notification and the list of pictures. To you then find your suppliers and order via their website. (DarQroom for me)
In all cases you can set your price, through personalized profile. you can specify any VAT, depending on qty discount, price of the photo, price min / order, shipping, discount shipping ... You can even include coupon codes .. in short it's cool. Even out prints you can purchase the rights to your image to the TV for example. You set the starting price, then according PhotoShelter full of broadcasting standards, places, materials etc., the price weights to perfect the pricing.
In fact do you think Photoshelter costs, "Transaction fee of 10% the next month." I have not found sample paypal. Nothing exorbitant.
I hate sharpness filters as specified. Of course I set my sharpness to RAW 6-7/10. but it has nothing to do with a filter in post production is the editing and not the RAW development.
PhotoShelter if you are passionate about you can you subscribe to my code: ME2BA5RK5T
You will have deductibles on your transactions and $ 30 welcome. But I expect movement on the side of DarQroom on this business. Everything will depend on their price, but they are cheaper I return home the frenchies
@ Brian: I'm very bad with PC! Inevitably, they abused me for over 10 years. No I'm not hard, I just realized I forgot the speed of procs for the portable and 18MP +. Thank you. 2.53 ghz is great indeed.
@ Jp: Yes Aperture.
@ Emmanuel: That for the NAS and electrical networks. That's what is my third HDD to "slide".
You can tell more about "how you do" for your watermarks? Unless you had already published an article on the subject ...
Thank you
@ Emmanuel: for the NAS, I understand - it is also backupé on an external USB HDD (Synology proposes to automate all that) but this is actually the same place. The Syno also offers backup to Amazon S3 (I have an account), I would have the tent, but also see the price it cost me. The whole is undulating course (it cost much more than a small inverter / product against power surges), power failure, it's safer. The backup is expensive, for sure.
@ Masden: there I'll have to try a calibration, because I also printed with DarQroom, and rendering is not the same (+ contrasted so) on my screen. For the NAS, if a disk dies (that's already happened), the NAS reports (by alarm), up to you to change, it will automatically rebuild the data between the two. Clevo is known among gamers, very demanding in performance, it incorporates desktop components in a laptop (eg Core i7). Mine accepts three discs (I have 2 at 7 200 rev / min instead of 5400 and usually a SSD for system and applications that require speed drive, the SSD is 3x + faster than a normal disk laptop). Finally, for DxO film pack, it is either applied alone or in Photoshop plugin.
@ Masden: with RAID-1 (mirror), the risk is minimal. The controller will simply write the same thing on two different disks. Advantage: redundancy. Disadvantage: the effective area is half of the gross area achetee (1TB to 2TB useful purchased). In case of seed, in the worst case, it is always possible to recover the data by performing a surface scan. With RAID-5, the data is distributed across a cluster disk, with a calculated value called a checksum (which is used to verify and restore the data). Advantage: you consume less disk (report gross / net of about 1.3 to 1.5). Drawback: there is a problem at the controller, retrieve the data is more difficult, even impossible, and the only solution is to identify the controller, which is not always possible.
Otherwise, as Oliver points out, if you take the material seriously (Synology, QNAP, ...), the system warns you fail, and therefore leaves you the possibility to change the defective disk before total failure.
In this regard, you absolutely right about the period of 3 years. This is roughly the lifetime of a disk that rotates 24/7 has constant temperature and humidity in a computer room. SATA drives also being much more fragile than the SAS or SCSI.
Well I stop, otherwise I will be here tomorrow morning (that's "a little" my profession, in fact).
@ Olivier: a NAS syno saved gives you a very good level of security. It remains only to you unplug your USB drive. I also think of online backup, without really looking closely, or costs, levels of security offered.
@ Jp: Not yet, but how to say, it's a bit complicated to explain? bcp because of the Craft well placed. means the tool. But it's the result that counts.
Want to know how you make a watermark or how to do with aperture?
@ Olivier: Nice ability indeed!
For DXO mouais then. I prefer the "integrated" solutions.
@ Emma: Thank you for that. I was a geek info, I became a geek photo, so I kind of lost
@ Masden clearly, it might be interesting. Especially since the operation does not seem obvious a priori in Aperture and give your watermarks very well!
For watermark there moultes tutorials on the net. Photoshop script is effective example.
Otherwise Mogrify is perfect for Lightroom
On Phooshelter seems really good. The scope of management for even the sale of broadcast (TV, other) interests me greatly. All your pictures are self-Fullfilment? You could show me a link? (In private if necessary)
@ Jp: Ok, in Aperture 3 you can go to the menu "Aperture"> Presets> Image Export. Then determines an export profile and bottom right of the window click on an image to choose! According to you to do the rest
Mr @ eddy: sample gallery: http://www.photoshelter.com/c/merwenba/gallery/Terra-Australis/G0000KxoV1XV5JqE
Masden @ => thank you, I test it!
@ Masden: "For my prints I am at DarQroom manuals": you have an ICC profile that you created with your probe is not it? I'm gonna invest in this case. DarQroom seems not bad for their offer prints - in contrast to sharing photos, I prefer Flickr, far ahead.
The advantage with this is the solution DarQroom website more aesthetically PhotoShelter. their themes are really pro!
For profiles I choose "none - expert mode" like that my settings are not affected.
I have on my computer than the probe logically
I was on your link and I have a concern. The sale of photo download is for commercial exorbitant prices!
To use a web, a year during a 728 × 900 max is € 1000.
A full page flyer is also starting to € 1000.
So I wonder, have you ever made for commercial sales via Photoshelter? This is very far from the UPC argus stuff, argus which is already correctly positioned.
Your price for printing by cons are quite "normal."
And if not, what is the impression "Premium Glossy paper Matte gold" that you propose? The rest is on FUJI DPII, that also offers more negative and that's from the mini-lab on Fuji as I understand it.
So far from the Argus of the UPC, but you can define a less expensive ...
This paper is proposed by FUJI DarQroom DPII. Certainly they have much in common there is two, ahem ..
For Photoshelter, I will test it in the night or tomorrow probably.
For this story of Fuji, in fact they use a priori all the mini-lab of that mark and thus the paper that goes with it. It is only from 20 × 30 which is entitled to the Epson Stylus upscale, but now the cheapest starts at 12 € and a few more negative at € 2 cons and some version of the same size for mini- Laboratory.
Anyway, here's why I look closely at what it is.
And what then is this premium paper that shows in your printing options on Photoshelter?
Superb explanation, thank you for sharing with us all!
Bravo, I know how I operate now, I need to seriously understand the Aperture library from the time: s, and I buy the hard drive. Par contre, un conseil d'un bon disque dur aussi silencieux que le imac 27″ ??
Non pas vraiment mais moi jachète que des Western Digital !
Non pas vraiment mais moi je n'achète que des Western Digital !
Des précisions concernant l'importation. Il me semble que tu n'importes pas dans la librairie d'aperture, mais dans un dossier spécifique.
Question : pourquoi ne pas tout intégrer dans la librairie ? Personnellement je ne le fais pas, car j'ai cru découvrir que Time Machine sauve l'intégralité de la librairie à chaque petite modification.
L'export dans les banques, si j'ai bien compris, revient à créer une librairie complète avec l'intégration des RAW + les modifications/paramètres). Est-ce bien le cas ?
Je serai ravi d'avoir un billet sur la mise en place et l'utilisation des profils aussi bien écran qu'imprimante. Ainsi que de l'utilisation de l'épreuvage à l'écran
J'en reviens à la deuxième sauvegarde (par banque). Et je confirme donc que tu ne sauves que la librairie, cette dernière ne contenant pas les .raw d'après la capture d'écran des réglages d'importation. I'm wrong?
@Kagou : J'importe en effet dans un dossier spécifique, mais via aperture bien sur.
Non, je ne veux surtout pas intégrer mes photos dans ma librairie. Ca c'est bien avec des JPEG de 5 MP. mais avec mes raws, pas question. Par exéprience, le fait d'intégrer les photos dans la librairie rend galère et très longue la copie manuelle de cette dernière en cas de besoin. De plus, je veux garder mes dossiers accessibles facilement afin de les copier sur un autres HDD sans avoir à rentrer dans ma librairie via le finder.
Les banques sauvegarde ta librairie. Si tu travaille en référencé, tes raws ne seront pas sauvegardés.
Je ne suis ni assez interessé, ni calé sur les profils pour en faire un article. Je les utilise juste. Et ca me convient pour mon travail.
Tout a fait, les raws sont dans un autre dossier. Je les sauve via time machine + une autre sauvegarde Hebdomadaire.
Thank you very much
Ton workflow est intéressant. Cependant, je ne te trouve pas encore assez parano ^^.
Je en sais pas si je suis sous le règne de la malchance, quoi qu'il en soit, j'ai déjà perdu des données avec sauvegarde sur ordi + disque dur.
Actuellement, ce que je fais (bon c'est vachement geek) est un upload automatique vers mon flickr, sauvegarde sur disque dur externe + android 500go, sauvegardes rsync sur serveurs de stockage distant.
Là jdors tranquille ^^. Mais jsuis parano, je sais. Seulement, on l'est jms assez.
Sinon je préfère lightroom, mais parce que j'ai des amis sous Mac d'autres sur PC, et vu qu'on s'entraide, qu'on se file des « trucs », ba il me faut un logiciel compatible avec les 2.
En quoi trouves tu que lightroom est bordélique?
Sinon j'aimerais avoir de tes conseils concernant plutot « comment pouvoir automatiser au maximum les processus chronophages » … Parce que moi avec renommage sur un logiciel, tri dans plein de dossiers à la main, encadrage sur un autre logiciel, … Ca rend fou ^^
Les sauvegardes online sont trop lentes et passez flexibles pour moi (synchro des modifs faites sur les fichiers). De plus il me faudrait 1TO de stockage online. Beaucoup trop important.
Je vois plus une utilité pour les amateurs experts, avec moins de 200 go de données.
Lightroom a plusieurs espaces. Aperture en a qu'un.
Lightroom a un assistant export compliqué et mal présenté. Aperture n'en a qu'un.
Bref c'est la meme chose que PC et MAC. Pourquoi faire compliqué (LR) quand on peut faire simple (MAC). Aller j'avoue on frise le troll.
je ne fais rien à la main. Aperture me renomme à l'importation tous mes dossiers.
Sinon tu as des renammer, des logiciels spécialisés qui font ça bien. Concentrez-vous sur l'essentiel vos photos, pas sur les petites manies chronophages pour un workflow plus que parfait.
Soite pour Lightroom. A chacun de trouver avec quel logiciel il se sent le mieux.
Perso je trouve pas Lighrtroom compliqué. Photoshop peut etre, oui, mais surement pas Lightroom.
J'ai des renammer mais je souhaiterais trouver qqch qui me permet d'aller encore plus vite. Je pense je vais me pondre un script en ligne de commande au final, en se basant sur les noms de dossiers par ex…
Sinon pour les sauvegardes en ligne, j'ai un système automatisé basé sur un serveur linux qui est de toute manière allumé H24. Une fois les photos traitées mises dans un « dossier spécial » en qq sorte, il upload tout seul les photos sur Flickr dans les bons albums.
J'ai plus de 40000 photos de sauvegardés, donc je pense que vous pourriez avoir 10To que ca ne serait pas trop important encore… Mais après, il faudrait vous y retrouver.
Bref, à chacun de trouver sa solution perso qui lui convient le mieux … Merci en tout cas de nous avoir partagé le votre !
Good evening,
Juste un truc sur la netteté, je cite :
« Je déteste les filtres netteté comme précisé. Bien sur je configure ma netteté RAW sur 6-7/10. mais ça n'a rien à voir avec un filtre en post prod qui est de la retouche et non du développement RAW. "
Par contre si je ne me trompe pas, c'est le genre de réglage encré dans le raw que seul les logiciels propriétaires, DPP et Nikon NX2, peuvent lire.
Lightroom n'en tient pas compte. Aperture non plus normalement.
Dans Aperture, je peux aussi toucher ce reglage de netteté RAW. Pour lightroom je ne sais pas. L'effet est moins flagrant que sous DPP mais il est là.
Je vous remercie Merwen pour cette présentation et notamment pour les réglages d'importation qui ont redonné de l'éclat à mes photos.
[...] dur et un besoin conséquent de puissance pour ne pas passer 20 jours à traiter ses Raws (si si)! (voir mon article sur le Workflow). C'est toute la chaine informatique qui doit supporter une telle [...]